Democrats flip listening to into travesty in rush to bash Barr


I’m no stranger to terrible congressional hearings.

Over time, I’ve sat on the press desk dozens of occasions, watching lawmakers squawk and squabble, fuss and feud, and customarily make fools of themselves.

I’ve endured the limitless grandstanding when the cameras are on, droning duplication as members cowl the identical floor, and unabashed partisanship.

However the Home listening to with William Barr shattered all of the information.

It was a humiliation to the Democrats, a humiliation to Congress, and a humiliation to the nation.

The Democratic members had been so decided to bait and badger the lawyer normal that they barely let him converse.

No matter you consider Barr, no matter you consider the Democrats, no matter you consider the substantive points being debated, the Judiciary Committee session was a prepare wreck.


The giveaway got here on the very starting, when the chairman, Jerry Nadler, completed his remarks by telling the AG: “You might be projecting concern and violence nationwide in pursuit of apparent political aims. Disgrace on you, Mr. Barr.”

An equally telling second occurred almost 5 hours later, when Barr–who waited an hour for the listening to to start out as a result of Nadler had been in a automobile accident–asked for a five-minute break, noting he’d had no lunch. Nadler balked. “You’re a category act,” Barr stated. The chairman then relented.

Now Republicans have performed their share of hyperpartisan hearings. And lots of of them rolled over for Barr on Tuesday, politely beseeching him to please inform the committee why such and such an allegation in opposition to him was clearly false.

However for almost all occasion, it was an opportunity to problem Barr on points starting from policing of city riots to the Justice Division’s remedy of Trump allies. However they had been principally within the sound of their very own voices.

I used to be curious whether or not the foremost papers would airbrush out the Democratic techniques and simply excerpt the tightest exchanges. The Washington Submit got here closest to capturing the absurdity of the “acrimonious” session:

“Lawmakers spent months searching for Barr’s testimony on a bunch of points associated to the Trump administration’s interactions with the Justice Division. With the lawyer normal lastly seated on the witness desk, Democrats principally made speeches or talked over him as he tried to reply their questions, seemingly squandering any likelihood of getting new data or an admission out of him.

“‘This can be a listening to; I believed I used to be the one who was speculated to be heard,’ Barr stated in exasperation.”

A typical change concerned Democratic Rep. Joe Neguse:

NEGUSE: I’ve one other query for you, on June 19, 2020

BARR: No, really I must reply that query.

NEGUSE: Mr. Lawyer Basic, you probably did reply the query.

BARR: No, you stated below penalty of perjury. I’m going to reply the rattling query, okay?

Barr’s facet of the story, when he was capable of get just a few phrases out, was that he did no political favors for the president and thought, as an example, that Roger Stone ought to go to jail.

“I’m supposedly punishing the president’s enemies and serving to his buddies,” he instructed Nadler. “What enemies have I indicted?”


Barr additionally defended the usage of federal brokers in cities like Portland, citing accidents to these attempting to subdue the rioters and saying “when individuals resist regulation enforcement, they’re not peaceable.”

However Republicans had been hardly passive. Congressman Jim Jordan performed a video montage displaying correspondents speaking about peaceable protests, adopted by scenes of violence and mayhem.

CNN’s Jake Tapper demanded an apology from Jordan, saying his reporters “precisely described the protests as peaceable after which usually exploding into one thing else, together with violence at night time…They weren’t calling violent protests peaceable,” including that Jordan “did a disservice to the American individuals and you probably did a disservice to the reality.”

The Ohio lawmaker responded on Fox that “you had two reporters in that video saying these are peaceable protests whereas there’s a constructing burning within the background, for goodness sake.”

The Barr listening to, coming three months earlier than the election, could have been many issues, however it was not what Congress calls oversight.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here